INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS - LOOKING GLASS NEWS | |
Costa Rica |
|
by Mark Weisbrot ZNet Entered into the database on Wednesday, February 15th, 2006 @ 19:37:58 MST |
|
Costa Rica is a small Central American country of four million people
that - unlike its neighbors El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua during their
bloody civil wars - has never attracted much attention in the United States,
except as a destination for tourists and retirees. But last Sunday's election
there should serve as another wake-up call for Washington When I first met Ottón Solís last year I was glad to hear that
he was running for president of Costa Rica. He impressed me as an economist
who was well-informed, reasonable, sincere, and committed to economic policies
that put the public interest of his country first. I also thought he had about as much chance of winning as a third party candidate
in the United States. I was wrong, as were the major international media, and
the most recent pre-election polls. He is currently tied with former Costa Rican
president Oscar Arias, as the election authorities conduct a manual vote count
to see who has won. Regardless of the final outcome, Solís' surprise showing has
important implications for the course of Latin America and U.S.-Latin American
relations. First, it shows how deep the electorate's dissatisfaction is with
the status quo in the region, and with the "Washington Consensus"
- or "neoliberal" economic policies as it is more commonly labeled
in Latin America. Corruption was an important issue - as it is throughout the region -- with
three ex-presidents having become implicated in bribery scandals since 2004.
But the major economic policy difference between Solis and his opponents was
over CAFTA (the Central America Free Trade Agreement). Solís, a former planning minister under Arias, argued persuasively that
CAFTA as currently written would pose a threat to many of the country's farmers,
its telecommunications sector, and to domestic industry. He also objected to
the agreement's provision for settling disputes - similar to NAFTA's - which
would erode national sovereignty over important economic and environmental policy.
And together with many health advocacy organizations in the hemisphere, he has
opposed CAFTA's provisions on pharmaceutical drugs, which go beyond the World
Trade Organization in their protection of the pharmaceutical industry at the
expense of patients In the last seven years there have been six winning presidential candidates
who ran very explicitly against the "neoliberal" economic reforms
of the last 25 years: in Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela, Ecuador, Uruguay, and
most recently Bolivia. There is a clear economic reason for this pattern: Over
the last 25 years Latin America has suffered the worst economic growth performance
in its modern history. From 1980-2005, income per person in the region grew
by only 10 percent. In the prior 20 years - 1960-1980 -- it grew by 82 percent. Costa Rica is better off than most of the region: its per capita income is
the third highest in Latin America. Life expectancy is the same as in the United
States. So it is all the more remarkable that an insurgent candidate in Costa Rica
could possibly topple the establishment parties that, like Republicans and Democrats
here, have ruled the country for the last half century. Even more so that he
could do this against Oscar Arias, a Nobel Peace Prize winner and probably the
most prominent and respected political figure in the country. Costa Rica's election shows that this wave of democracy, infused by demands
for economic and political change sweeping across Latin America, is still growing
stronger. It is no coincidence that Costa Rica, the only one of six countries
in the proposed CAFTA agreement to hold out against ratifying it, is much more
democratic than the others. Over the last quarter century the majority in Latin
America has had little or no say on the most important economic decisions that
affect their lives, despite an overall increase in formal electoral democracy.
But now they are demanding a voice. Here in Washington, there is little notice that Latin America's unprecedented
economic growth failure might have something to do with the continuing electoral
revolt. The failure has been mostly ignored; to the extent that it is acknowledged,
policy-makers here argue that the reforms just haven't been implemented enough. But Latin America's voters beg to differ. With eight more national elections
on the 2006 calendar, perhaps the message will eventually get through here. ________________________________ Mark Weisbrot http://weisbrot-columns.c.topica.com/maaeuBRaboiTMcjuhOocafpNFx/
is Co-Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. |