9-11 - LOOKING GLASS NEWS | |
Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges |
|
by Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet Entered into the database on Thursday, January 05th, 2006 @ 13:05:01 MST |
|
Says "pull it" meant to evacuate firefighters, but there
were no firefighters in the building After nearly two years of steadfast silence, Silverstein Properties have finally
responded to questions about what Larry Silverstein meant when he told a PBS
documentary that WTC Building 7 was "pulled" in the late afternoon
of September 11 2001. Building 7 occupied a city block immediately north of the World Trade Center
complex. Photos taken minutes before its collapse show small fires on two or
three floors. Building 7 became only the third steel building in history before
or since 9/11 to collapse from fire damage. The other two were the North and
South towers of the World Trade Center. Any building that was not owned by Silverstein Properties strangely remained
upright. Photo and video evidence of the collapse shows classic indications of a controlled
demolition. The standard 'crimp' in the center-left top of the building and
the subsequent 'squibs'
of smoke as it collapses clearly represent explosive demolition. Even Dan Rather, commenting
on the collapse for CBS News said that the collapse was, "reminiscent
of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on television before, where
a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.” Click
here for Alex Jones' video analysis of the collapse of Building 7. Questions about the highly suspicious nature of the building's collapse remained
comparatively muted until January 2004, when a PBS documentary, America Rebuilds,
originally broadcast in September 2002, received attention across the Internet. The documentary was made infamous for one comment made by Larry Silverstein
on the subject of 9/11. Silverstein states, "I remember getting a call
from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure
they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such
terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made
that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." Click here to watch
the clip. We know that the term 'pull it' means to bring the building down by means of
explosives because in the same documentary a cleanup worker (in December 2001)
refers to the demolition of WTC Building 6 when he says, "...we're getting
ready to pull the building six." The term is industry jargon for planned
demolition. Click here to listen
to the clip. For the following year and a half the Internet and alternative talk radio was
aflame with talk of Building 7 and Silverstein's apparent admission. For many
it is now the central issue of 9/11. In June 2005 this website
reported Silverstein's only response to date. It was an ambiguous comment
made to New York Post journalist Sam Smith. Silverstein told Smith that he "meant
something else" by the "pull it" comment but mysteriously refused
to elaborate any further. Silverstein Properties have finally provided a detailed explanation of what
Silverstein meant when he said Building 7 was pulled. The State Department, as part of its pathetic efforts to debunk 9/11 research,
has posted the response from Silverstein's spokesperson Dara McQuillan on
its website. Bear in mind that the State Department said
that China's organ trade was a conspiracy theory even though the State Department
itself put out a report on how China harvests organs from executed prisoners
on a different area of its website. The response reads as follows. Seven World Trade Center collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001, after
burning for seven hours. There were no casualties, thanks to the heroism of
the Fire Department and the work of Silverstein Properties employees who evacuated
tenants from the building. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a thorough investigation
of the collapse of all the World Trade Center buildings. The FEMA report concluded
that the collapse of Seven World Trade Center was a direct result of fires triggered
by debris from the collapse of WTC Tower 1. In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department
Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein
that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the
fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was
to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have
them withdraw from the building. Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of the building
and at 5:20 p.m. the building collapsed. No lives were lost at Seven World Trade
Center on September 11, 2001. The State Department website then comments, As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television
documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss
of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan
has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of
firefighters remaining in the building. The insurmountable problem with this explanation of Silverstein's statement
is that there were no firefighters inside WTC 7. Dr. Shyam Sunder, of the National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST),
which investigated the collapse of WTC 7, is quoted in Popular Mechanics (9/11:
Debunking the Myths, March, 2005) as saying: "There was no firefighting
in WTC 7." The FEMA report on
the collapses, from May, 2002, also says about the WTC 7 collapse: "no
manual firefighting operations were taken by FDNY." And an
article by James Glanz in the New York Times on November 29, 2001 says about
WTC 7: "By 11:30 a.m., the fire commander in charge of that area, Assistant
Chief Frank Fellini, ordered firefighters away from it for safety reasons." Some defenders of the official 9/11 story say that the term "pull"
is not demolition lingo for "bring down by controlled demolition".
However, the same PBS video in which Silverstein makes his admission, contains
the following exchange: (unidentified construction worker): "Hello? Oh, we're getting ready to
pull building six." Luis Mendes, NYC Dept of Design and Construction: "We
had to be very careful how we demolished building six. We were worried about
the building six coming down and then damaging the slurry walls, so we wanted
that particular building to fall within a certain area." But even this argument is beside the point. The building's collapse had all
the hallmarks of controlled demolition. Silverstein's explanation, after two years of stonewalling, that "pull
it" meant to withdraw the firefighters is a lie. There were no firefighters
in the building for hours before the building's collapse. So what did Larry Silverstein mean when he stated: "I said, 'You know, we've
had such terrible loss of life, may be the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.
And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."
He could not have meant that they should "pull" the firefighters from
the building because there weren't any firefighters in the building, at least
according to FEMA, NIST, and Frank Fellini, the Assistant Chief responsible for
WTC 7 at that time. And if he meant "pull the firefighters" then why
did he say "pull it", with no reference to anything other than the building?
The argument that "pull" is not used to mean "demolish" a
building is belied by the other footage in the PBS documentary. And consider the
timing: "they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building
collapse." Could it really be possible that some (nonexistent) fire brigade
was removed from the building and just at that moment ("then") the building
collapsed? Is there really any doubt here about what Silverstein meant? The only reasonable conclusion is that Larry Silverstein's statement is an
admission that WTC 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition, meaning that
the official version of what happened to WTC 7 is false, and casting serious
doubt on the official story that terrorists of a foreign origin destroyed the
twin towers, as well as on the rest of the official account of 9/11. Note that
this admission is a statement against Silverstein's own interests (putting him
at odds with the official version of events and potentially jeopardizing his
insurance claims). Such statements are given great weight as a matter of law. In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial
Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties' estimated
investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. This building's collapse alone resulted
in a profit of about $500 million. How concerned should we be therefore that Silverstein Properties bought the
lease from MetLife for Chicago's Sears Tower in March 2004? The length of time that it took Silverstein to respond to these charges and
the fact that his eventual rebuttal does not correspond with the facts only
gives us more grounds for skepticism. A real, thorough, impartial, independent investigation of the collapse of Building
7 needs to take place and if the conclusions of that investigation are that
Building 7 was professionally demolished, criminal charges need to be brought
against those suspected of involvement. |