POLICE STATE / MILITARY - LOOKING GLASS NEWS | |
Neocon Stasi: Spy vs. Spy |
||
by Kurt Nimmo Another Day in the Empire Entered into the database on Thursday, December 29th, 2005 @ 11:13:50 MST |
||
Increasingly, it is appropriate to characterize the Bushcon spy operation
as an all-American version of Stasi (Staats Sicherheitsdienst), the feared East
German secret police. As it turns out, the neocon Stasi engaged in spook activity
not only against American citizens, but government bureaucrats and fellow spooks
as well. “NSA spied on its own employees, other U.S. intelligence
personnel, and their journalist and congressional contacts,” reports Wayne
Madsen. “WMR has learned that the National Security Agency (NSA),
on the orders of the Bush administration, eavesdropped on the private conversations
and e-mail of its own employees, employees of other U.S. intelligence agencies—including
the CIA and DIA—and their contacts in the media, Congress, and oversight
agencies and offices,” behavior fitting of the Committee for State Security,
or the Soviet era KGB, responsible for the liquidation of anti-Soviet and counter-revolutionary
organizations. As Madsen writes, neocon political hack Porter Goss has his job cut-out for
him. “The journalist surveillance program, code named ‘Firstfruits,’
was part of a Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) program that was maintained
at least until October 2004 and was authorized by then-DCI Porter Goss. Firstfruits
was authorized as part of a DCI ‘Countering Denial and Deception’
program responsible to an entity known as the Foreign Denial and Deception Committee
(FDDC). Since the intelligence community’s reorganization, the DCI has
been replaced by the Director of National Intelligence headed by John Negroponte
and his deputy, former NSA director Gen. Michael Hayden.” It should be noted that Negroponte ran death squad operations in Nicaragua
and supported the brutal military dictatorship of General Gustavo Alvarez Martínez
in Honduras. Even though he was implicated in the Iran-Contra criminal operation,
the Senate had no problem confirming Negroponte to “serve” as U.S.
Ambassador to Iraq. Obviously, the Senate figured Negroponte’s Curriculum
Vitae as a criminal and overseer of death squads was an asset in Iraq. Now this
facilitator of sadistic butchery will be monitoring the behavior of the American
public and running “denial and deception” operations (and the primary
“denial” will be denying Americans their birthright—protection
under the Constitution and Bill of Rights). Some may believe my characterization of the neocon spook operation as an all-American
version of Stasi is erroneous. However, all one need do is consider the rumor
Markus Wolf, the former director of the East German Stasi, “was being
considered for the top post at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security,”
according to the Idaho
Observer. “The rumor caused such a stir that the Bush administration
chose Third Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Michael Chertoff to replace outgoing
Tom Ridge as Director of Homeland Security,” not that Chertoff is an advocate
for civil liberties and the Constitution. It should be noted that Chertoff “is
a longtime member and activist in the Federalist Society,” according to
Right Web. “The
Federalist Society, which since its founding in 1982 has been closely linked
to the neoconservative political camp, aims to rid the system of liberal judges
and stamp out what it sees are its overly egalitarian and secular impulses.
Many association members believe that the Constitution and the country’s
laws should primarily serve to ensure order and social orthodoxy rather than
democracy and human rights.” In other words, get rid of the “egalitarian”
concepts of the Constitution, as in equality under the law, as stated by the
14th Amendment (the Straussian- Machiavellian version of reality dictates that
some people have more liberty than others, viz.: the Platonic neocons, acting
as philosopher-kings, have the right to run roughshod over the benighted masses
and use them as cannon fodder in their forever war schemes). It should also be noted that Chertoff “supervised the round-up of 750
Arabs and other Muslims on suspicion of immigration violations. Treated as suspected
terrorist sympathizers or material witnesses, the ’suspects’ were
held without bond for as long as three months, often in solitary confinement,
despite having never been charged with any crime,” a precursor of things
to come for American citizens (and in fact a number of the Muslims rounded up
in Gestapo-like raids were American citizens, albeit Muslim American citizens).
Of course, the neocon Stasi apparatus now emerging is connected at the hip to
this Gestapo-like behavior—the neocons and their apparatchiks need to
assemble dossiers on “traitors,” be they journalists, fellow spooks
not with the program, or peace activists and members of the growing patriot
movement. It is especially pertinent to consider Chertoff’s remarks (made
in a War Street
Journal op-ed piece) in regard to the lawfulness of rounding up people in
the dead of night and snooping on law-abiding Americans: “Basic policy
questions like this cannot be simply left to the judiciary.” Of course,
it hardly matters that the judiciary, by and large, is a Reagan-Bush deck stacked
with reactionaries. Finally, if we are to believe Rasmussen
Reports, a clear majority of Americans have no problem with snooping on
journalists and fellow citizens in egregious violation of the Constitution.
“Eighty-one percent (81%) of Republicans believe the NSA should be allowed
to listen in on conversations between terror suspects and people living in the
United States. That view is shared by 51% of Democrats and 57% of those not
affiliated with either major political party,” Rasmussen Reports notes.
Meanwhile, concentration camp advocate Michelle
Malkin applauds this rampant ignorance of the Constitution, and “Don
Lambro at the Washington Times reports that ’some Centrist Democrats’
(whoever they are) are worried that ‘attacks by their party leaders on
the Bush administration’s eavesdropping on suspected terrorist conversations
will further weaken the party’s credibility on national security,’”
according to the National
Ledger. Of course, the above mentioned “suspected terrorists”
are not members of al-CIA-duh but rather Americans practicing their once guaranteed
civil liberties, as the example of history (i.e., Operation CHAOS and COINTELPRO)
repeatedly demonstrates. ____________________ Read from Looking Glass News |