9-11 - LOOKING GLASS NEWS | |
Retired Air Force Colonel Challengers Official Reports of September 11 |
|
from The Power Hour
Entered into the database on Tuesday, May 03rd, 2005 @ 22:25:43 MST |
|
Versailles, MO 65084 (573) 378-6049, (573)378-5998 FAX During an appearance on The Power Hour radio program today, USAF Col. George
Nelson (ret.), a 30 year veteran, aircraft accident investigator and expert
in aircraft maintenance and aircraft identification, stunned the Power Hour
listeners by stating that in regard to the 911 attack at the Pentagon, “I
didn’t see any damage on the sides of that hole, anything that would say
that an airplane that size could have gone through a 16 or 18 ft. hole.”
He was referring to the hole seen at the Pentagon before the collapse of the
e-ring. He went on to say, “There would be large parts of that
wing lying on the ground on the outside. It wouldn’t all go through that
hole…It is impossible for all of the time change parts that have these
serial numbers that are trackable to the specific aircraft,… it is impossible
for them to be totally destroyed where these serial numbers could not be read.”
www.physics911.net/georgenelson.htm
When asked to express his opinion in regard to the controversial photographs
and video showing an anomaly attached to the belly of the plane that struck
the South tower and the mysterious “flash” that occurred as the
plane made contact, Col. Nelson said, “There appeared to be something
attached to the belly and there definitely appeared to be a flash. What caused
that flash? Who knows? I can’t explain it and it’s just a number
of these anomalies like that, that just makes the entire picture more suspect.”
The video and photographic evidence can be seen in the video ”911 - In
Plane Site.” www.911inplanesite.com
The “flash” was seen on four different video angles that captured
the plane that struck the South tower. Given that the flash occurred 6 to 10
feet to the right of the point of contact of the fuselage, Col. Nelson stated
that it was “highly unlikely” that it was caused
by static electricity or an aluminum burn. He also said that aluminum could
not have “vaporized” as was asserted by the official story. Due to the fact that public officials and news networks have refused to honestly
address these very serious questions raised by confirmable video and photographic
evidence, an increasing number of military personnel and airline pilots are
coming forward to challenge the official story of September 11th. More to come |