INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS - LOOKING GLASS NEWS | |
Redistributing the Land, Hugo Chavez Style |
|
by Jens Erik Gould The Toronto Star Entered into the database on Monday, November 14th, 2005 @ 13:21:30 MST |
|
Analysts say president's land-expropriation plan a world away from
disastrous Zimbabwean program. Surveying a vast and lush farm that he hopes to make his own, Pedro Antiaga
says social justice is finally being served in Venezuela. The privately owned, 1,200-hectare Santa Isabel farm has grown sugar cane for
decades, but Antiaga says the Venezuelan government will help him use the land
to grow pumpkins, beans and squash. Under a land redistribution campaign led by President Hugo Chavez,
thousands of rural poor like Antiaga are being granted rights to farm arable
land traditionally concentrated in the hands of wealthy landowners.
But Artiaga isn't waiting for the government to take the lead. He and
other farmers are slashing the Santa Isabel cane with machetes and laying claim
to land they say is rightfully theirs. "We're obligated to take this land because it is state land,"
says Antiaga, clad in a torn shirt dirtied by the rich soil. "Commander
Chavez is with our movement." Venezuela's land-reform campaign has won support from the rural poor but has
sparked criticism that it could infringe on private property rights. "In Yaracuy, there is no rule of law," says Santa Isabel owner Vicente
Lecuna, who accuses state officials of encouraging peasants to settle on his
property. He says farming co-operatives like Antiaga's have destroyed 40 per
cent of his sugar cane. Chavez insists his government respects private property rights and contends
that the land expropriations are being carried out only for public use or for
social necessity in a country where most non-state land is owned by a small
elite. In the latest stage of what he calls the "new socialism of the 21st century,"
Chavez has called on state officials to take over private land deemed "idle"
or lacking property titles dating back to 1848. Soldiers have enforced some
of the takeovers, at times denying owners and workers access to the land. In recent months, the government has extended its campaign to corporate-owned
land. One state government expropriated an idle tomato processing plant from
U.S.-based H.J. Heinz Co. and another seized a silo installation from Empresas
Polar, Venezuela's largest food company. The state government paid Heinz $256,000 (U.S.) for its seized plant, distinguishing
Venezuela's reform from Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe's massive land redistribution
effort, which has not reimbursed thousands of white landowners for their seized
farms. While critics say both the Venezuelan and Zimbabwean governments are giving
land to peasants with little agricultural experience, Venezuela offers farming
loans while Zimbabwean farmers severely lack resources to develop their land.
With agriculture a small player in Venezuela's oil-dependent economy, it is
unlikely that a fall in food production would cause the kind of food shortages
and other crises it has in Zimbabwe, notes Orlando Ochoa, an economics professor
at Andres Bello Catholic University in Caracas. Mugabe's reform also seized farms on the basis of race, targeting land owned
by white farmers, while Caracas focuses on productivity and property titles,
Ochoa says. Critics argue that the Venezuelan expropriations are concentrating more power
in the government by giving peasants farming licences for — rather than
ownership of — the land they farm. But Carlos Escarra, a constitutional lawyer and professor at the Central University
of Venezuela, rejects this common criticism, saying peasants actually become
property owners who lack only the right to sell their land. Chavez says that having co-operatives like Antiaga's farming on expropriated
land will lessen Venezuela's dependence on imports by satisfying domestic deficits
in food. And the government has launched a campaign to plant more than 200,000 hectares
of new sugar cane and cassava to produce sugar-based ethanol gasoline. Yet Yaracuy farm owner Vladimir Rodriguez says it is ironic that the same government
has not prevented co-operatives and extortionists from destroying more than
$15 million worth of sugar cane on 33 farms in his state alone, according to
his statistics. A state-run agrarian fund known as Fondafa also grants loans for farming machinery
to co-operatives that have taken over private property without state permission
and uprooted sugar cane crops. In one case of extortion, local delinquents — who farm owners say posed
as landless peasants — murdered sugar cane farm owner Antonio Vieira after
he refused to pay them to not destroy his crop. Yaracuy state secretary-general Col. Angel Yarza, who called on the government
to take over 48 ranches, denied in an interview that he had seen large quantities
of destroyed sugar cane. He assured that the state does not encourage land invasions,
but will not intervene to protect privately owned farms. Antiaga says Yarza and other state officials are helping his group's long fight
to take land away from owners like Lecuna, who for him represent a system of
traditional land ownership that prevent the rural poor from acquiring farms
or landing sustainable jobs. "We're human beings, too, and we have to eat," he says. But for farm owners, seizing private property and issuing loans to poor farmers
is no solution to poverty and unemployment. "(The co-operatives) just want credits that they won't pay back,"
says Lecuna. "They're not going to produce." |