Bush last week signed into law a bill which will see the federal government
begin to screen the DNA of all newborn babies in the U.S. within six months,
a move critics have described as the first step towards the establishment of
a national DNA database.
Described as a "national contingency plan" the justification for
the new law S. 1858, known as The Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of 2007,
is that it represents preparation for any sort of "public health emergency."
The bill states that the federal government should "continue to carry
out, coordinate, and expand research in newborn screening" and "maintain
a central clearinghouse of current information on newborn screening… ensuring
that the clearinghouse is available on the Internet and is updated at least
Sections of the bill also make it clear that DNA may be used in genetic experiments
One health care expert and prominent critic of DNA screening is Twila Brase,
president of the Citizens’ Council on Health Care who has written a detailed
analysis (PDF) of the new law in which she warns that it represents the first
program of populationwide genetic testing.
Brase states that S.1858 and H.R. 3825, the House version of the bill, will:
• Establish a national list of genetic conditions for which newborns
and children are to be tested.
• Establish protocols for the linking and sharing of genetic test results
• Build surveillance systems for tracking the health status and health
outcomes of individuals diagnosed at birth with a genetic defect or trait.
• Use the newborn screening program as an opportunity for government
agencies to identify, list, and study "secondary conditions" of individuals
and their families.
• Subject citizens to genetic research without their knowledge or consent.
"Soon, under this bill, the DNA of all citizens will be housed in government
genomic biobanks and considered governmental property for government research,"
Brase writes. "The DNA taken at birth from every citizen is essentially
owned by the government, and every citizen becomes a potential subject of government-sponsored
"The public is clueless. S. 1858 imposes a federal agenda of DNA databanking
and population-wide genetic research. It does not require consent and there
are no requirements to fully inform parents about the warehousing of their child’s
DNA for the purpose of genetic research."
In a previous report we outlined the consequences of the already existing DNA
warehousing operation in Minnesota, a program that the Citizens’ Council
on Health Care has been following closely for a number of years.
Ms. Brase explained in a statement last month that state Health Department
officials are now seeking exemption for the so called "DNA Warehouse"
from Minnesota privacy law. This would enable state officials to continue to
take the DNA of newborn infants without consent, which would also set the precedent
for nationwide policy on DNA screening.
DNA of newborns has already been harvested, tested, stored and experimented
The National Conference of State Legislatures lists for all 50 states, as well
as the District of Columbia, the various statutes or regulatory provisions under
which newborns’ DNA is already being collected.
In addition, all 50 states are now routinely providing these results to the
Department of Homeland Security.
The Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of 2007 merely establishes this practice
within the law.
Another vocal critic of bill S. 1858 is Texas Congressman Ron Paul who made
the following comments before the U.S. House of Representatives:
"I cannot support legislation, no matter how much I sympathize with the
legislation’s stated goals, that exceed the Constitutional limitations
on federal power or in any way threatens the liberty of the American people.
Since S. 1858 violates the Constitution, and may have untended consequences
that will weaken the American health care system and further erode medical privacy,
I must oppose it."
Paul, a medical doctor himself continued, "S. 1858 gives the federal bureaucracy
the authority to develop a model newborn screening program. Madame Speaker the
federal government lacks both the constitutional authority and the competence
to develop a newborn screening program adequate for a nation as large and diverse
as the United States. …"
"Those of us in the medical profession should be particularly concerned
about policies allowing government officials and state-favored interests to
access our medical records without our consent … My review of S. 1858
indicates the drafters of the legislation made no effort to ensure these newborn
screening programs do not violate the privacy rights of parents and children,"
"In fact, by directing federal bureaucrats to create a contingency plan
for newborn screening in the event of a ‘public health’ disaster,
this bill may lead to further erosions of medical privacy. As recent history
so eloquently illustrates, politicians are more than willing to take, and people
are more than willing to cede, liberty during times of ‘emergency,"