We Americans are eating a lot of genetically engineered food, and for
no good reason.
Since the mid-1990s, when corn and soybean varieties began being injected with
genes from bacteria and other unrelated species, we've been paying participants
in a food experiment with potentially unprecedented effects on human health,
the environment and food security.
By 2005, the Agriculture Department says, the vast majority of U.S. soybean
acres and 52 percent of corn acres were planted with genetically engineered
The bounty of these acres is in our candy, crackers and chicken pot pies, in
our pizza and pasta sauce, in our Coca Cola and Campbell's soups. Corn and soybeans
are ubiquitous: tens of thousands of processed foods contain soy, and the typical
consumer takes in 200 calories of high-fructose corn syrup per day. Alter the
genomes of corn and soybeans, and you've altered the diet of most Americans.
Corn and soybeans are staples of animal feeds, so we're also modifying the
diets of our beef cattle and milk cows, our pigs and chickens.
Yet lending our grocery dollars and stomachs to this venture gains us little.
The price of modified seed includes a technology fee that effectively siphons
off the bulk of any additional revenue farmers might gain from reduced pest
damage or decreased management costs.
Many hoped that genetically engineered crops would help the environment by
cutting pesticide use. We should have known that growing crops engineered to
tolerate herbicides could lead to more chemical use. A 2004 analysis funded
by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that the introduction of engineered
corn, soybeans and cotton caused a 122 million pound increase in pesticide use
And because resistant crops have encouraged near constant use of one or two
classes of herbicides, superweeds that withstand the chemicals have now emerged
and will require ever more potent poisons to control.
Another hope was that gene tinkering would help end world hunger. But the dream
of concocting drought-tolerant, insect-resistant, nutrient-dense supreme species
ignores the reality of global markets already awash in food. Hunger and malnutrition
result from poverty, not a lack of food in the world.
It's unlikely that we're getting health benefits from eating these crops. Scientists
are studying their possible effects. Among the findings: abnormal white and
red blood cell counts and inflammation of the kidney in rats fed genetically
engineered corn, accelerated growth of stomach and intestinal tissues of rats
fed engineered potatoes, and immune responses in mice fed altered peas. The
findings are controversial, but they should, at the very least, give us pause.
Meanwhile, pollen from genetically engineered crops is on the move. In a recent
study by the Union of Concerned Scientists, 50 percent of nonengineered corn
and soybean varieties tested by one laboratory contained DNA from engineered
versions. Chasing down and eliminating this freeflowing DNA from our seed supply,
should the need arise, will require Herculean effort.
The only clear reason why we're eating so much genetically modified
food is that Monsanto, Dupont and Syngenta, which together control over 25 percent
of global seed sales, want us to.
In the United States, Monsanto dominates many a menu. It owns half of the American
corn seed market, and its modified traits are present in roughly 90 percent
of soybean acres.
Monsanto is tossing salads too. In January 2005, it bought Seminis, supplier
of 3,500 varieties of fruit and vegetable seed to 150 countries. Monsanto now
controls more than 30 percent of the world's cucumber, hot pepper and bean seed
sales, and more than 20 percent of onion, tomato and sweet pepper seed sales,
according to the Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration.
Now consider that Monsanto and its cohorts are free to undertake the genetic
modification of any plant variety they own. The plant varieties they don't modify,
they can remove from the market. With one-fourth of the total value of the worldwide
commercial seed market already coming from engineered seeds, our choices for
unmodified crops and foods are rapidly dwindling.
As we relinquish control over our food to the gene engineers, we must ask:
Does Monsanto really know best?
Deborah Rich grows olive trees near Monterey, Calif.,
and writes about agriculture for the San Francisco Chronicle and other publications.
She wrote this essay for the Land Institute's Prairie Writers Circle, Salina,
Read from Looking Glass News
Whistleblower Says Genetically Engineered Crops May Cause Disease
Buys "Terminator" Seeds Company
Monsanto's Genetically Engineered Grasses Will "Wreak Havoc" on Native
Rice Supply Contaminated
Engineered Crops May Produce Herbicide Inside Our Intestines
develops "Genetically Modified Pig": The patenting of livestock
New study shows unborn babies could be harmed