The aggressive new campaign by the administration of President George
W. Bush to depict U.S. foes in the Middle East as "fascists" and its
domestic critics as "appeasers" owes a great deal to steadily intensifying
efforts by the right-wing press over the past several months to draw the same
The Rupert Murdoch-owned Fox News Network and The Weekly Standard, as well
as the Washington Times, which is controlled by the Rev. Sun Myung Moon's Unification
Church, and the neo-conservative New York Sun, have consistently and with increasing
frequency framed the challenges faced by Washington in the region in the context
of the rise of fascism and Nazism in the 1930s, according to a search of the
Nexis database by IPS.
All of those outlets, as well as two other right-wing U.S. magazines -- The
National Review and The American Spectator -- far outpaced their commercial
rivals in the frequency of their use of key words and names, such as "appeasement,"
"fascism", and "Hitler", particularly with respect to Iran
and its controversial president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Nexis, for example, cited 56 uses of "Islamofascist" or "Islamofascism"
in separate programmes or segments aired by Fox News compared with 24 by CNN
over the past year. Even more striking, the same terms were used in 115 different
articles or columns in the Washington Times, compared with only eight in the
Washington Post over the same period, according to a breakdown by Nexis.
Similarly, the Washington Times used the words "appease" or "appeasement"
-- a derogatory reference to efforts by British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain
to avoid war with Nazi Germany before the latter's invasion of Poland -- in
25 different articles or columns that dealt with alleged threats posed by Ahmadinejad,
compared to six in the Post and only three in the New York Times.
Israel-centred neo-conservatives and other hawks have long tried to depict
foreign challenges to U.S. power as replays of the 1930s in order to rally public
opinion behind foreign interventions and high defence budgets and against domestic
During the Cold War, they attacked domestic critics of the Vietnam War and
later the Ronald Reagan administration's "contra war" against Nicaragua
-- and even Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon -- as "isolationists"
and "appeasers" who failed to understand that their opposition effectively
served the interests of an "evil" Soviet Union whose ambitions for
world conquest were every bit as threatening and real as that of the Axis powers
in World War II.
Known as "the Good War", that conflict remains irresistible as a
point of comparison for hawks caught up in more recent conflicts -- from the
first Gulf War when former President H.W. Bush compared Iraq's Saddam Hussein
to Hitler; to the Balkan wars when neo-conservatives and liberal interventionists
alike described Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic in similar terms; to the younger
Bush's "global war on terrorism" (GWOT), which he and his supporters
have repeatedly tried to depict as the latest in a series of existential struggles
against "evil" and "totalitarians" that began with World
Given the growing public disillusionment not only with the Iraq war, but with
Bush's handling of the larger GWOT as well -- not to mention the imminence of
the mid-term Congressional elections in November and the growing tensions with
Ahmadinejad's Iran over its nuclear programme -- it is hardly surprising that
both the administration and its hawkish supporters are trying harder than ever
to identify their current struggles, including last month's conflict between
Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah, specifically with the war against "fascism"
more than 60 years ago.
As noted by Associated Press (AP) this week, "fascism" or "Islamic
fascism", a phrase used by Bush himself two weeks ago and used to encompass
everything from Sunni insurgents, al Qaeda and Hamas to Shia Hezbollah and Iran
to secular Syria, has become the "new buzzword" for Republicans.
In a controversial speech Tuesday, Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld was even
more direct, declaring that Washington faced a "new type of fascism"
and, in an explicit reference to the failure of western countries to confront
Hitler in the 1930s, assailing critics for neglecting "history's lessons"
by "believ(ing) that somehow vicious extremists can be appeased."
But Rumsfeld's remarks, which drew bitter retorts from leading Democrats, followed
a well-worn path trod with increasing intensity by the neo-conservative and
right-wing media over the last year, according to the Nexis survey. Significantly,
it did not include the Wall Street Journal whose editorial pages have been dominated
by neo-conservative opinion, particularly analogies between the rise of fascism
and the challenges faced by the U.S. in the Middle East, since 9/11.
Thus, the Washington Times published 95 articles and columns that featured
the words "fascism" or "fascist" and "Iraq" over
the past year, twice as many as appeared in the New York Times during the same
period. More than half of the Washington Times' articles were published in just
the past three months -- three times as many as appeared in the New York Times.
Similarly, the National Review led all magazines and journals with 66 such
references over the past year, followed by 48 in The American Spectator, and
14 by The Weekly Standard. Together, those three publications accounted for
more than half of all articles with those words published by the more than three
dozen U.S. periodicals catalogued by Nexis since last September.
The results were similar for "appease" or "appeasement"
and "Iraq". Led by the Review, the same three journals accounted for
more than half the articles (175) that included those words in some three dozen
U.S. magazines over the past year. As for newspapers, The Washington Times led
the list with 46 articles, 50 percent more than the New York Times which also
had fewer articles than its crosstown neo-conservative rival, the much-smaller
New York Sun.
Searching on Nexis for articles and columns that included "Iran"
and "fascist" or "fascism," IPS found that the Sun and the
Times topped the newspaper list by a substantial margin, as did the Review,
the Spectator, and the Standard among the magazines and journals. Nearly one-third
of all such references over the past year were published in August, according
to the survey.
Nexis, which also surveys the Canadian press, found that newspapers owned by
CanWest Global Communications, a group that owns the country's Global Television
Network, as well as the National Post, the Ottawa Citizen, and the Montreal
Gazette and several other regional newspapers, were also among the most consistent
propagators of the "fascism" paradigm and ranked far ahead of other
Canadian outlets in the frequency with which they used key words, such as "appeasement"
and "fascist" in connection with Iraq and Iran.
The group is run by members of the Asper family whose foreign policy views
have been linked to prominent hard-line neo-conservatives here and the right-wing
Likud Party in Israel.
Read from Looking Glass News
Total War? You’re an Appeaser of Fascism
to Neo-Fascism 101
Signs That Your Superpower Is Becoming a Cheap Rip-Off of the Soviet Union
63 Characteristics Of Fascism And America's Development As A Fascist Nation
to tell if you are in a tyrannical police state
Ten Signs of the Impending U.S. Police State
84: FEMA's Blueprint for Martial Law in America
and Katrina: REX-84 Revisited
in America: Are We There Yet?
of Creeping Fascism
please': I smell the long-forgotten rot of fascism'