Whitewash piece seeks to dismiss questions about FBI most wanted page
but doesn't address why embassy indictment took 3 months yet no 9/11 charge
after 5 years
A Washington Post article today attempts to refute and dismiss questions as
to why the FBI's most wanted page for Osama bin Laden includes no apportion
of blame for 9/11 - yet the Post fails to answer why there has been no formal
indictment of bin Laden five years after 9/11 when it only took three months
to charge him with the 1998 embassy bombings.
A key cornerstone of the 9/11 truth movement's challenge that verifiable evidence
proving the government's version of events be presented in court is the fact
that bin Laden's wanted page on the FBI website contains no reference to 9/11,
only charging bin Laden with involvement in the August 7, 1998, bombings of
the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya.
In late September 2001, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI Rex Tomb
News, "There's going to be a considerable amount of time before anyone
associated with the attacks is actually charged."
"To be charged with a crime, this means we have found evidence to confirm
our suspicions, and a prosecutor has said we will pursue this case in court."
In June 2006, Muckraker Report investigative reporter Ed Haas contacted the
FBI to ask why 9/11 was not specifically mentioned on Bin Laden's wanted page
on the FBI website.
“The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin
Laden's most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting
Bin Laden to 9/11," he was told Rex Tomb.
Five years later and bin Laden has not been charged as having any association
with the 9/11 attacks. By the FBI's own guidelines, they have found or been
provided with no evidence to connect bin Laden to the events of that day. This
includes the alleged "confession tape" which was miraculously 'discovered'
in a house in Jalalabad by US troops and features a bin Laden doppelganger
with a rotund frame and absent the real bin Laden's slender nose. According
to the FBI bin Laden is left-handed, yet the tape shows him writing a note with
his right hand. In Bin Laden's first interview after the 9/11 attacks he denied
any involvement. This isn't like a kid caught thieving in a sweet shop -
terrorists always claim responsibility for attacks they have perpetrated otherwise
why bother killing people to send a political message?
The fact that the FBI does not consider the 'confession tape' as reliable evidence
of involvement in 9/11 is completely dismissed by the Washington Post who say
the tape proves that Al-Qaeda have, "proudly taken responsibility for the
In July 2006, the New
York Times reported that a CIA counterterror unit named Alec Station, a
10-year old subdivision tasked with finding bin Laden, had been closed down.
In addition, former CIA director Buzzy Krongard told
the London Times that bin Laden should stay free and it was better off for
the world for him to remain at large.
On two separate occasions President Bush has publicly stated that he is no
longer interested in catching bin Laden.
to view video
Post article is clearly an attempt to whitewash and dismiss further investigation
into why there has been no formal indictment implicating bin Laden in the 9/11
attacks. At no point in the piece does the Post's senior journalist Dan Eggen
address the question of why there has been no formal indictment - only stating
that "Future indictments may be handed down as various investigations proceed
in connection to other terrorist incidents, for example, the terrorist attacks
on September 11, 2001."
The embassy bombings occurred on August 7th 1998 and bin Laden was indicted
for them on November 4th of the same year - less than three months after the
attack. Yet we are approaching five years since 9/11 and no indictment has taken
place nor has any formal court hearing been scheduled or even considered.
The Washington Post whitewash fails to answer the question of why there has
been no formal indictment.
The reason that there has been no indictment in the five years since the attack
and why there will never be one is because the evidence connecting nineteen
incompetent pilots acting at the behest of an ailing Sheik hobbling between
a cave and a kidney dialysis machine with the most infamous terror attack in
history is non-existent. Any further high-profile inquiry into what happened
on 9/11, even if it is a cover-up job appointed by Bush like the 9/11 Commission,
will only turn up more bizarre inconsistencies which render the official story
The criminals wish for no further scrutiny of their act of mass murder
and the current counter-attack against the 9/11 truth movement being run through
their propaganda organs like Popular Mechanics and the Washington Post is part
of that resistance.
Read from Looking Glass News
says, "No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11"
Connected to 9/11? Not According to the F.B.I.
hear dead people
Post Explains How the Nazi-Created CIA Protects Us
Osama Groomed for a Return
Abu, and Ayman: al-CIA-Duh Telethon
and the J. Edgar Hoover Memorial Vacuum Cleaner