Untitled Document
Taking a Closer Look at the Stories Ignored by the Corporate Media
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact

All News
Disaster in New Orleans
Government / The Elite
Human Rights
International Affairs
Iraq War
London Bombing
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism

All Commentaries
Government / The Elite
Iraq War
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism

Advanced Search
View the Archives

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly

9-11 -

Dear Democracy Now!

Posted in the database on Saturday, August 26th, 2006 @ 13:56:12 MST (3602 views)
by Reprehensor    911blogger.com  

Untitled Document

Dear Democracy Now!,

On Wednesday, May 26th, 2004, you featured a "debate" between Chip Berlet and author David Ray Griffin - "The New Pearl Harbor: A Debate On A New Book That Alleges The Bush Administration Was Behind The 9/11 Attacks" - (Link.)

Many people who have been following skepticism of the "official story" of 9/11 were deeply disappointed by this lopsided "debate", which more or less concluded with this challenge by Amy Goodman;

AMY GOODMAN: Name just one. Name just one structural engineering expert who said it is not feasible that the planes caused the towers to go down.

You will be pleased to note that we can name one now, his name is Charles N. Pegelow, you can read his resume here.

Since naming one "just one" Structural Engineer "who said it is not feasible that the planes caused the towers to go down" seems to be some sort of litmus test for Democracy Now!, surely it's time for a rematch. Or at the very least, a serious critical examination of the mountain of evidence that suggests that the "official" story of 9/11 (as recorded by the 9/11 Commission in their Report) should be undertaken, (finally), by Democracy Now!?

Or, are the rumors that foundation funding will stop if Democracy Now! undertakes a serious examination of alternative 9/11 theories, (Referred to by many as "9/11 Truth") true?

Is a lop-sided hit-piece debate seriously the best we can expect from D-Now!?

Are you aware that a Professor of Economics (Paul Zarembka) has studied publicly available data regarding the "put" option rumors that arose after 9/11 and found that "indeed, there is evidence of insider trading before 9-11 on American Airlines and United Airlines."

Are you aware that one of the most astute researchers of British and American covert operations writing today (Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed) has spent 5 years researching al-Qaeda & 9/11 and concluded that, "It (al-Qaeda) has no existence as an independent concrete entity. It designates a highly developed category of Western covert operations designed to secure destabilization through the creation, multiplication, mobilization, and manipulation of disparate mujahideen groups. The evidence suggests that this was certainly the case on 9-11."

Are you aware of the large data dump of First-Responder oral histories made public last year by the New York Times? Here are some samples;

"we heard . . . what sounded like a loud explosion and looked up and I saw tower two start coming down" - Sudnick.

"I heard three explosions, and then . . . tower two started to come down" - Darnowski.

"it almost sounded like bombs going off, like boom, boom, boom, like seven or eight" - Turilli.

"heard explosions coming from . . . the south tower. . . . There were about ten explosions. . . . We then realized the building started to come down" - Carlsen.

"it looked like the building was blowing out on all four sides. We actually heard the pops" - Meola.

"It was a frigging noise. At first I thought it was---do you ever see professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'? . . . I thought it was that." - Rivera.

"the building popped, lower than the fire. . . . I was going oh, my god, there is a secondary device because the way the building popped. I thought it was an explosion" - Burke.

"It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit. . . . [W]e originally had thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down" - Cachia.

Democracy Now! broadcasts from a former N.Y.F.D. Firehouse, shouldn't this testimony be considered merely out of respect for the many NY fire personnel who died on duty on 9/11?

How can you just ignore it? Downplay it? Ridicule it? Belittle it?

I hope that others will join me in asking Democracy Now! to wake up, clear the fog, abandon the propaganda, and start asking some serious questions about what happened to this country on 9/11/2001.


A skeptic.

Contact Democracy Now!


Read from Looking Glass News

What’s Wrong with Amy Goodman?

New WTC Complex Photos Highlight Bizarre Building 7 Collapse

Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?

A Hundred Firecrackers

Bombs Heard in the Twin Towers

Unquestioned Answers

Debunking Popular Mechanics' 9/11 Lies

Twin Towers wreckage turning up all over the place

20 reasons to question the official story of 9/11

5 Reasons to Question the Official 9/11 Story


A Half-Dozen Questions About 9/11 They Don't Want You to Ask

Showtime - Look Inside The 911 Smoke Plume

9/11: The Myth and the Reality

The Destruction of the World Trade Center

The Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training

Flying a Plane Into the World Trade Center?

Scientific Evidence that Official 9/11 Story is a Lie

The 1975 World Trade Center Fire

Landmark Implosion Looks Like WTC Collapse

Twin gas tanks' demolition foreshadows Twin Towers' demolition

Strange Times at the Pentagon

Pentagon 911 Witness - Interview with April Gallop

Pentagon Papers Author Daniel Ellsberg Says Government May Have Carried Out 9/11

9/11 Aicraft Registry Oddities

9/11 Pentagon eyewitness IDs Global Hawk

How Flight 77 Hitting The Pentagon Would Really Look?

9-11: Animation showing military precision of flight paths

Planes of 911 Exceeded Their Software Limits

All "911" News Articles

Go to Original Article >>>

The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly

Untitled Document
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact
Copyright 2005 Looking Glass News.