It is an old saying in the advertising trade that you sell the problem,
not the solution. That helps explain why the media today are awash with images
of disease. Erectile dysfunction, depression, stress, attention deficit disorder,
on and on - you can't escape them and the sense of looming peril that they conjure
Politicians sell terror and fear; pharmaceutical companies sell disease.
Every state and stage of existence has become a pathology in need of pharmaceutical
"intervention," and life itself is a petri dish of biochemical deficiency
and need. Shyness is now "social anxiety disorder." A twitchy tendency
has become "restless leg syndrome." Three decades ago the head of
Merck dreamed aloud of the day when the definition of disease would be so broad
that his company could "sell to everyone," like chewing gum.
That day is rapidly approaching, if it's not already here. "We're increasingly
turning normal people into patients," said Dr. Lisa M. Schwartz of the
Dartmouth Medical School. "The ordinary experiences of life become a diagnosis,
which makes healthy people feel like they're sick."
In one sense, the ads have been successful. The Kaiser Family Foundation found
that every dollar drug companies spend on ads brings more than four dollars
in additional sales. But for most others, the result has been soaring medical
insurance costs, toxic side effects, and new tensions between doctors and patients,
who increasingly badger doctors for the drugs they've seen on TV.
One study found that 30 percent of Americans have made these demands. A Minnesota
doctor complained recently that patients now push him for sleep medications
"when maybe they just need to go to bed on a more regular basis."
But perhaps the worst part is that prescription drug ads have immersed us all
in a pervasive drug culture that seems to have no boundaries. We are being reduced
to helpless "consumers" who have no capacity to deal with challenges
other than by taking a pill. Last month Tim Pawlenty, the Republican governor
of Minnesota, called for a moratorium on prescription drug ads. It's about time.
For most of the past half century, there were tight restrictions on the general
advertising of prescription drugs. These require doctors' guidance for a reason;
so why should Madison Avenue get involved? But under heavy pressure from the
drug and advertising industries, the government backed down in the late 1990s,
and that started the tsunami.
Spending on drug ads for the general public more than tripled between 1996
and 2001. It is now some $4 billion a year, which is more than twice what McDonald's
spends on ads. In 1994, the typical American had seven prescriptions a year,
which is no small number. By 2004, that was up to 12 a year. Homebuilders are
touting medicine cabinets that are "triple-wide."
The industry says this is all about "educating" the consumer. But
an ad executive was more candid when he said - boasted, really - that the goal
is to "drive patients to their doctors." Reuters Business Insight,
a publication for investors, explained that the future of the industry depends
on its ability to "create new disease markets." "The coming years,"
it said, "will bear greater witness to the corporate-sponsored creation
The Kaiser study found that drug ads increase sales for entire categories of
drugs, not just the one in question. The ads really are selling the disease
more than a cure.
Advertising is just one way the industry has sought to accomplish this goal.
It also funds patient advocacy groups such as Children With Attention Deficit
Disorder (CHADD), and doctors who push for expanded definitions of disease,
among a host of other things. (When the definition of ADD expanded in the 1980s,
the number of kids tagged with this problem increased by 50 percent.)
But advertising is the most pervasive and aggressive way of selling sickness.
It also is the hardest to justify. Medicine is supposed to be about science,
not huckstering; about healing people, not persuading more of them that they
are sick. There are far better ways to inform the public about health issues
than to spend billions of dollars a year pushing pills.
This is why more than 200 medical school professors recently called for an
end to prescription drug ads, and why close to 40 health and seniors groups
have joined them. Even the American Medical Association, many members of which
have close ties to the pharmaceutical industry, has urged restrictions. Washington
should listen to these doctors. As Governor Pawlenty put it, we need to put
"the decisionmaking back where it should be - on an informed basis between
the patient and the doctor."
Jonathan Rowe is issues director at Commercial Alert and
a fellow at the Tomales Bay Institute. He is a former Monitor staff writer.
Read from Looking Glass News
lawlessness of the FDA, Big Pharma immunity, and crimes against humanity
Alimentarius: Big Pharma's Attempt to Subjugate Planet Earth...
health and freedom of choice
Pharma's Big Graveyard
cartels and chatrooms: how unscrupulous drug firms woo the public
firm blocks cheap blindness cure
Pharma Uses Scare Tactics to Keep Americans Buying Prescription Drugs
firms accused of turning healthy people into patients
prove prescription drugs are 16,400% more deadly than terrorists
the Drug Companies Want Us to Be Sick