Untitled Document
Taking a Closer Look at the Stories Ignored by the Corporate Media
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact

NEWS
All News
9-11
Corporatism
Disaster in New Orleans
Economics
Environment
Globalization
Government / The Elite
Human Rights
International Affairs
Iraq War
London Bombing
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism
Miscellaneous

COMMENTARY
All Commentaries
9-11
CIA
Corporatism
Economics
Government / The Elite
Imperialism
Iraq War
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism

SEARCH/ARCHIVES
Advanced Search
View the Archives

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly

WAR ON TERRORISM -
-

Holland Tunnel Bomb Plot a "Political Gain" Ruse

Posted in the database on Saturday, July 08th, 2006 @ 12:57:04 MST (1761 views)
by Kurt Nimmo    Another Day in the Empire  

Untitled Document

It didn’t take long for the story to fall completely apart, not that you would know it reading or especially watching the corporate media.

“One former intelligence field officer says, and two other CIA officials confirm, that the alleged plot by Muslim extremists to bomb the Holland Tunnel in New York City was nothing more than chatter by unaffiliated individuals with no financing or training in an open forum already monitored extensively by the United States Government,” ace reporter Larisa Alexandrovna writes for Raw Story. ( see story below)

“The so-called New York tunnel plot was a result of discussions held on an open Jihadi web site,” Philip Giraldi, a former CIA officer, told Alexandrovna.

According to other intelligence officials cited by Alexandrovna, the entire affair, consisting of nothing more than chat room chatter, “seems to have been exposed for political gain,” a “direct challenge to a New York Times report this week of the disbandment of Alec Station, the CIA unit responsible for tracking Osama bin Laden since before the September 11, 2001 attacks.”

In other words, it was simply another day in Bushzarro world, another cycle of neocon spawned fake terrorism propaganda. “The alleged bomb plot, sources suggest, may have been to alleviate Bush administration concerns that the Alec Station story would make them appear to be ‘weak on terror.’” Or put another way, the neocons are unable to “smoke out” Osama bin Laden because the CIA asset died in a village near Kandahar in December, 2001, according to the Egyptian newspaper al-Wafd.

However embarrassing the closure of the Bin Laden unit was for the neocons, as reported by the New York Times, there is another reason the Bush neocons, the Justice Department, and the FBI are making up preposterous stories—it stokes the flames of irrational fear and loathing of terrorism on the home front.

Of course, Larisa Alexandrovna’s revelation has not put a damper on the corporate media. As usual, since the very idea of blowing up the Holland Tunnel and flooding lower Manhattan is nothing short of absurd, a bit of story tweaking was in order.

“Initial reports said that the terrorists wanted to attack the Holland Tunnel, a major thoroughfare for cars entering Manhattan. But officials said the group had specifically mentioned only the PATH train tunnels that commuters travel through on their way to New York and New Jersey,” reports Pat Milton, a stenographer at the Associated Press.

FBI Assistant Director Mark J. Mershon said the supposed plot “involved martyrdom and explosives,” never mind the alleged perpetrators were nowhere near Manhattan or New Jersey (one was purportedly in Canada, a nice touch, as Ottawa recently served as the stage for a “homegrown” terrorist plot, that is to say the RCMP entrapped a handful of patsies).

Naturally, as today is the first anniversary of the false flag operation in London, the idea of bombing an underground train is rather effective.

“Details of the plot—first reported by the Daily News—emerged on the one-year anniversary of the attacks on the London transportation system that killed 52 people. Officials said the timing of Friday’s report in relation to the anniversary was coincidental,” the Associated Press continues.

Sure it was.

“Officials cited the arrest of the Lebanese suspect—described as the scheme’s mastermind—as a significant break in the investigation. A Lebanese official said the Beirut man confessed to plotting to attack New York City tunnels later this year, and that he was acting on Osama bin Laden’s orders.”

Funny what people will say under the duress of torture.

_________________________________

Sources say no serious plot for NYC, just hate chatter

Larisa Alexandrovna
The Raw Story

One former intelligence field officer says, and two other CIA officials confirm, that the alleged plot by Muslim extremists to bomb the Holland Tunnel in New York City was nothing more than chatter by unaffiliated individuals with no financing or training in an open forum already monitored extensively by the United States Government, RAW STORY has learned.

“The so-called New York tunnel plot was a result of discussions held on an open Jihadi web site,” said Philip Giraldi, a former CIA officer and contributor to American Conservative magazine, in a late Friday afternoon conversation. Although Giraldi acknowledges that the persons involved – “three of whom have already been arrested in Lebanon and elsewhere - are indeed extremists," their online chatter is considerably overblown by allegations of an actual plot.

“They are not professionally trained terrorists, however, and had no resources with which to carry out the operation they discussed," Giraldi added. "Despite press reports that they had asked Abu Musab Zarqawi for assistance, there is no information to confirm that. It is known that the members discussed the possibility of approaching Zarqawi but none of them knew him or had any access to him.”

Two other intelligence officials with experience in the field on extremist operations concurred--and expressed concern that what could have been an operation to eventually track known extremists (should they eventually make actual contact with funds and training,) seems to have been exposed for political gain.

Some see this latest “ploy” as a direct challenge to a New York Times report earlier this week of the disbandment of Alec Station, the CIA unit responsible for tracking Osama bin Laden since before the September 11, 2001 attacks. Moreover, the article contends that officials say the unit was “disbanded late last year and its analysts reassigned within the C.I.A. Counterterrorist Center.”

Some members of Congress have said that they were not informed of the unit’s closure and expressed concern.

In response to reports that the unit was disbanded, Senator John Kerry (D-MA), who ran against President Bush in the 2004 election, responded earlier this week with a demand for the immediate reinstatement of the unit.

“I fully support efforts to adapt our response to the evolving nature of the threat," wrote Kerry in a letter to John Negroponte, Director of National Intelligence Office of the Director of National, "but this is not a compelling rationale for curtailing efforts to bring this mass murderer to justice."

The alleged bomb plot, sources suggest, may have been to alleviate Bush administration concerns that the Alec Station story would make them appear to be "weak on terror." It is not clear this early on, however, how much of a real and immediate threat the bomb plot may have been.

Director of Homeland Security Michael Chertof seemed unconcerned earlier today, when the news first broke. Chertoff said at a press conference Friday, "It was never a concern that this would actually be executed… We were, as I say, all over this."

The FBI, however, contends that the threat was very much real. "This is a plot that involved martyrdom and explosives," targeting the "tubes that connect Jersey and lower Manhattan," Assistant Director Mark J. Mershon told the Associated Press today.

Special Agent Rich Kolko, a spokesperson for the FBI, told RAW STORY in a late Friday phone call that, “Mr. Mershon clearly stated the position of the FBI in this case.”

“In sum, the plot, if that is what we would call it, was not well conceived, and there was no possibility of flooding Wall Street," Giraldi added. "There was no connection to a cell in the US. Finally, professional terrorists generally do not discuss targeting on open channels. As it was being monitored from the beginning of the open discussion, there was little chance anything concrete would have developed."

__________________________________

Read from Looking Glass News

Chat Room Terrorists and the Holland Tunnel



Go to Original Article >>>

The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly




Untitled Document
Disclaimer
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact
Copyright 2005 Looking Glass News.