9-11 - LOOKING GLASS NEWS | |
9/11 Aicraft Registry Oddities |
|
by xsic bastardx The Rigorous Intuition Board Entered into the database on Wednesday, July 19th, 2006 @ 14:56:59 MST |
|
I had been aware of some of this but no to this extent. This shit is
crazy. Here are some very strange findings regarding the paper-fate of the
four aircraft that went "missing" on 9/11. The following info is copied
directly from www.planecrashinfo.com www.planecrashinfo.com.
You're free to verify the data yourself if you want to do the homework. I did...
11 Sep 2001 New York City, New York United Air Lines American Airlines American Airlines United Air Lines It shows the four flights of 9/11, including tail numbers and crash information
on the links. The information below is copied directly from the Federal Aviation
Administration's N-number registry <registry.faa.gov/> The first plane listed is American Airlines Flight 11, tail number N334AA,
which crashed into the WTC North Tower. Note reason for cancellation, and FAA Registry --------------------------------- N334AA is Deregistered Deregistered Aircraft 1 of 1 Aircraft Description Next is American Flight 77, tail number N644AA, which hit the Pentagon. FAA Registry --------------------------------- N644AA is Deregistered Deregistered Aircraft 1 of 1 Aircraft Description Next is United Flight 175, tail number N612UA, which hit the South Tower Deregistered Aircraft 1 of 1 Aircraft Description Hmmm. What? Cancelled registration on 9/28/05? Not destroyed and Deregistered Aircraft 1 of 1 Aircraft Description Huh? Cancelled? On the same date in 2005? Not destroyed and cancelled
How can American Airlines flights show the planes destroyed and the
registration cancelled, while both United flights show the planes as simply
being cancelled without explanation 4 years after they allegedly were destroyed?
Why? What the heck is going on here? These are public records, accessible
by everyone until their purge date is reached. That is Nov. 11, 2006 for both
United flights. There is no purge date listed for the two American Airlines
flights. Why would a company keep two aircraft that had been destroyed on its
active lineup for four years, and then simply list the registration as "Cancelled"?
Even the most ardent coincidence theorist is going to have to think
hard to come up with some rationale for this one. Please pass this information on to anyone that you think might be able to use
it.
_______________________________
Read from Looking Glass News
Scholars
for 9/11 Truth under Attack
Pentagon
911 Witness - Interview with April Gallop Former
Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect Disgusting
Iran-Contra Criminal Grills Jim Fetzer Former
Reagan Deputy and Colonel Says 9/11 "Dog That Doesn't Hunt" Reynolds:
"Come Out of the White House with Your Hands Up!" Former
Reagan Treasury Secretary Questions Twin Towers Collapse Representative
Of Largest 9/11 Families Group Says Government Complicit In Attack Norge
"Le Monde" puts 9/11 on Front Page Connecting
The Dots - Zionists & 911 The
Israeli Moles Who Controlled U.S. Defense Computers on 9/11 Rumors
of Israeli Involvement in 9/11 How
Flight 77 Hitting The Pentagon Would Really Look? 9-11:
Animation showing military precision of flight paths Planes
of 911 Exceeded Their Software Limits 9/11:
The Myth and the Reality The
Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training A
Half-Dozen Questions About 9/11 They Don't Want You to Ask 20
reasons to question the official story of 9/11 9/10/01
: ON THE EVE OF DESTRUCTION 5
Reasons to Question the Official 9/11 Story |