9-11 - LOOKING GLASS NEWS | |
Planes of 911 Exceeded Their Software Limits |
|
by Jim Heikkila ViewZone.com Entered into the database on Saturday, July 08th, 2006 @ 18:05:22 MST |
|
Two of the aircraft exceeded their software limits on 9/11. The Boeing 757 and 767 are equipped with fully autonomous flight capability,
they are the only two Boeing commuter aircraft capable of fully autonomous flight.
They can be programmed to take off, fly to a destination and land, completely
without a pilot at the controls. They are intelligent planes, and have software limits pre set so that pilot
error cannot cause passenger injury. Though they are physically capable of high
g maneuvers, the software in their flight control systems prevents high g maneuvers
from being performed via the cockpit controls. They are limited to approximately
1.5 g's, I repeat, one and one half g's. This is so that a pilot mistake cannot
end up breaking grandma's neck. No matter what the pilot wants, he cannot override this feature. The plane that hit the Pentagon approached or reached its actual physical limits,
military personnel have calculated that the Pentagon plane pulled between five
and seven g's in its final turn. The same is true for the second aircraft to impact the WTC. There is only one way this can happen. As well as fully autonomous flight capability, the 767 and 757 are the ONLY
COMMUTER PLANES MADE BY BOEING THAT CAN BE FLOWN VIA REMOTE CONTROL. It is a
feature that is standard to all of them, all 757's and 767's can do it. The
purpose for this is if there is a problem with the pilots, Norad can fly the
planes to safe destinations via remote. Only in this flight mode can those craft
exceed their software limits and perform to their actual physical limits because
a pre existing emergency situation is assumed if this mode of flight is used.
[Google "Raytheon Global Hawk system"] Terrorists in fact did not fly those planes, it is totally and completely impossible
for those planes to have been flown in such a manner from the cockpit. Those
are commuter aircraft, not F-16's and their software knows it. Another piece of critical evidence: the voice recorders came up blank.
The flight recorders that were recovered had tape that was undamaged inside,
but it was blank. There is only one way this can happen on a 757 or 767. When
the aircraft are commandeered via remote control, the microphones that go to
the cockpit voice recorder are re routed to the people doing the remote controlling,
so that the recording of what happened in the cockpit gets made in a presumably
safer place. But due to a glitch in the system on a 757/767, rather than shutting
off when the mic is redirected the voice recorder keeps running. The voice recorders
use what is called a continuous loop tape, which automatically re passes itself
past the erase and record heads once every half hour, so after a half hour of
running with the microphones redirected, the tape will be blank. Just like the
recovered tapes were. Yet more proof that no pilot flew those planes in the
last half hour. Eight of the hijackers who were on those planes called up complaining that
they were still alive. I'd bet you never heard about our foreign minister flying
to Morocco and issuing an official apology to the accused, did you? No, terrorists
did not fly those planes, plastic knives and box cutters were in fact too ridiculous
to be true. Any of the remaining accused have certainly been sought out and
killed by now. Our information IS controlled The cell phone calls from the aircraft could not have happened. I am a National
Security Agency trained Electronic Warfare specialist, and am qualified to say
this. My official title: MOS33Q10, Electronic Warfare Intercept Strategic Signal
Processing/Storage Systems Specialist, a highly skilled MOS which requires advanced
knowledge of many communications methods and circuits to the most minute level.
I am officially qualified to place severe doubt that ordinary cell phone calls
were ever made from the aircraft. It was impossible for that to have happened, especially in a rural area for
a number of reasons. When you make a cell phone call, the first thing that happens is that your
cell phone needs to contact a transponder. Your cell phone has a max transmit
power of five watts, three watts is actually the norm. If an aircraft is going
five hundred miles an hour, your cell phone will not be able to 1. Contact a
tower, 2. Tell the tower who you are, and who your provider is, 3. Tell the
tower what mode it wants to communicate with, and 4. Establish that it is in
a roaming area before it passes out of a five watt range. This procedure, called
an electronic handshake, takes approximately 45 seconds for a cell phone to
complete upon initial power up in a roaming area because neither the cell phone
or cell transponder knows where that phone is and what mode it uses when it
is turned on. At 500 miles an hour, the aircraft will travel three times the
range of a cell phone's five watt transmitter before this handshaking can occur.
Though it is sometimes possible to connect during takeoff and landing, under
the situation that was claimed the calls were impossible. The calls from the
airplane were faked, no if's or buts. I hope I made sense, if you have questions I will respond if possible. If I
do not respond, please research this out yourself, search the boeing site, search
the DARPA site, search were you have not searched before. Some of the information
is classified and leaked by individuals, and it is also being scoured from the
net. I have all of the original documents on my computer to safeguard against
this. Please do not ignore this, because only Norad has the flight codes for those
aircraft, we did 911 to ourselves. Hitler had the Reichstag, we have 911. If
911 proves to not be enough to make the US citizenry set aside its rights for
safety, the people who did 911 most certainly have access to nuclear material.
911 must be exposed for what it was before that material is used. " ________________________ Read from Looking Glass News Representative
Of Largest 9/11 Families Group Says Government Complicit In Attack Connecting
The Dots - Zionists & 911 The
Israeli Moles Who Controlled U.S. Defense Computers on 9/11 Rumors
of Israeli Involvement in 9/11 Mossad:
RSA Security & Ptech Run US Govt Computers Norge
"Le Monde" puts 9/11 on Front Page 9/11:
The Myth and the Reality The
Destruction of the World Trade Center The
Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training A
Half-Dozen Questions About 9/11 They Don't Want You to Ask 20
reasons to question the official story of 9/11 Flying
a Plane Into the World Trade Center? 9/10/01
: ON THE EVE OF DESTRUCTION 5
Reasons to Question the Official 9/11 Story Scientific
Evidence that Official 9/11 Story is a Lie How
Flight 77 Hitting The Pentagon Would Really Look? |