Pretty soon after the events of 9/11, there were people who rose serious questions about the official story of 9/11. Now, four and a half years later, the evidence that this story is a lie, is overwhelming. Question is, what are we going to do about it? Are we going to sit and leave it for what it is, allowing the perpetrators to continue their illegal operations? Where do you think that would lead to? What will happen with our democracy if we allow these practices? And maybe the biggest question that we might ask ourselves is: “Why is it that we still allow criminals to lead our country and more and more determine our lifes?” People of this world, please think about what you allow this world to become if you allow the present course of actions taken by leaders who seek nothing else but power and control over others and eventually total world domination!

Some may still think that the official story is true, because they simply cannot believe that our leaders would be capable of doing such terrible crimes against their people. Well, if you are one of those who live in such emotional fields that you simply cannot bear the truth that your leaders would be capable of doing these things despite the scientific evidence that they are, then please don’t read this any further, for you wouldn’t accept any of this anyway. Emotions can and do shut down one’s ability to think clearly and to examin the facts with a clear mind. Our leaders and indeed our corporate networks know this and use it to their advantage to gain control over you. Look what has happened since 9/11, the patroit act, the department of home and security, Afghanistan, Iraq, the American government spying on its own people, and even the constitution being questioned! Are you really prepared to give up your freedom in order to be protected from so called “terrorism”? Is our country really any saver than it was before 9/11? Face it people, YOU HAVE BEEN LIED TO BY YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT.

Apart from the wild stories that flow over the internet and the claims by our government that these are all conspiracy theories, there certainly is scientific evidence provided by scientists and students who conducted their own research and have proven beyond doubt that the official story of what happened on 9/11 is a lie. I will provide some very important facts that will tell us an entirely different story when viewed from the laws of physics and the laws of nature as we know them. What I will show you here comes from the documentary “9/11 Eyewitness” and in case you aren’t able to get that documentary yourself, which you should really try, you can read the evidence presented in this article.

First of all, forget about all the so called “evidence” provided by the government that terrorists were behind the attacks. All the information being presented can be easily faked by all the sophisticated means that the security and other government agencies have to their disposal. Evidence can be and indeed has been manufactured in many cases in order to gain what is desired, not just in the case of 9/11. That is no secret and not knew. For example, the so called phone calls that beloved ones had received from their relatives and friends. It has scientifically been proven that these calls could not have been made from airplanes that flew at 32000 feet as flight 93 did. The signal simply wouldn’t be strong enough. This has been tested and confirmed!

But what about the collapses of the buidlings? Admittedly, at the time of the events it was all so horrible that you cannot blame anyone for not having a clear mind as to what was really happening. However, the pictures and footages and recordings of the events are still there and now we may have a clearer perception of what exactly happened at the moment that these WTC buildings collapsed. There are at least three things which are totally inconsistent with the laws of nature and physics:

1. Never before nor after 9/11 has a high-rise steel-framed building collapsed because of fire.

2. Buildings that collapse meet resistence from their own material and therefore cannot collapse in freefall as both WTC towers and WTC building 7 did.

3. Pyroclastic flows, which were evident as each building collapsed, only occur in cases of high explosive energies, as with volcanic eruptions and controlled demolitions.

Defenders of the official explanation that the jetliner crashes and fires were responsible for the total destruction of the three WTC buildings have been unable to cite even a single example of the total collapse of a high-rise steel-framed building from any cause other than controlled demolition. Consequently they have cited collapse incidents that do not even remotely resemble the cases of the World Trade Center skyscrapers.

Earthquakes

Bear in mind that the Richter Scale is logarithmic, and that a difference of 0.1 means a logarithmic increase of a factor of 10 and a seismic increase of roughly 30 times. Look at the magnitudes that were recorded and at the amount of TNT that is required to produce them:

Why is there so much difference in seismic energy caused by the collapse of the south tower (2.1) and the north tower (2.3)? Both towers were of similar material and construction. Let's see what the law of conservation of energy tells us:

According to this physical law, the towers should have collapsed in roughly the same time and with the same seismic energy being released, however, as we have seen, this is not the case! So what caused the difference? These matters have never been discussed in public nor have they been presented by the corporate networks.

Signs of Explosions

Then there is the ejection of concrete and steel as the towers collapsed. In a normal case, if the top had weakened sufficiantly because of the impact of the plane, it would have come down and fallen on the street instead of taking down the entire building and imploding on itself. See what Newton’s 1st law, the Law of Inertia, says about an object in motion: Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it. Now look at the following picture of the south tower as it started to collapse:

According to Newton’s law the top of the building should have fallen on the street, but instead the whole tower came down ejecting debris which could only have been caused by large explosions inside the building, correcting the top’s fall and keeping it on top of the second section! As you can see, the pancake theory would never have applied here, even if the structure of the building would not have been strong enough. However, the towers' structural design was made of three sections that were placed on top of each other and with each tower, the plane ended up in the upper section. Up to date the designers of these towers are still convinced that they should have been able to withstand the impact of more than one Boeing 707! The following pictures show why the building imploded on itself:

The first picture shows debris being catapulted strait out, like a canon ball. The second image shows parts of the steel frame stuck in a nearby building. These parts had not "fallen" into that building but had been catapulted by one of the many explosions inside the towers. If you don't believe that there were explosions then please look at the following chart. It shows to the second each heavy explosion at the base of the south tower that occured prior to its collapse at 9:59am:

These series were witnessed by many people, and at the time of the collapse there were also people who witnessed the series of explosions on each floor as the building came down. Does that not look like controlled demolition?

The Law of Gravity

If you are still not convinced then consider this: How can a high-rise steel-framed building collapse on itself at the speed of gravity and almost entirely on its own footprints? It has never been recorded in history and I assure you that it never will be! Only by means of controlled demolition can such a building be brought down and implode on itself. If you would take the original footages and compare the collapse of each WTC building, especially the collapse of building 7, to the freefall of an object from the same altitude, you would see that all three buildings came down with nearly the speed of gravity, and in case of building 7 even faster! How can that be? CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. Only with controlled demolition you can create a vacuum in which a building comes down faster than the speed of gravity. The following images are also frames from the documentary where the fall of building 7 is compared to that of an object in freefall:

The (top) image shows building 7 collapsing. Look at the object and the time set out next to the building. The (bottom) image shows the time that the object hits the ground, and as you can see building 7 is already down. This is not manipulated! Everyone with a copy of the original footages recorded by multiple cameras can do the same experiment. I have run this test myself. You can download the result here (with air resistance) and here (in vacuum), both files about 3MB.

Pyroclastic Flows

Pyroclastic flows are a very specific and not widely understood physical phenomenon that played a prominent role in the physical appearance of the WTC collapses. As each building collapsed the streets were filled with pyroclastic flows. What is a pyroclastic flow? Science states that:

Pyroclastic flows can only occur when a dense slurry of fine dust is suspended in air or (volcanic) gasses and is concentrated in a defined area. The suspension will then act as a separate, denser fluid that remains distinct as it moves through the less dense medium. Because of their density such flows can reach speeds of hundreds of miles an hour and do tremendous damage, especially with the high temperatures seen in volcanic events.

The only other example of this phenomenon takes place under water and is referred to as a turbidity current. These usually occur where the sediment-laden continental shelf drops off into the deep ocean basins, as occasional "landslides" of sediment break off and flow downslope.

The only known exception for pyroclastic flows to occur other than in nature is when a (high-rise) building is brought down by controlled demolition. Let's look at some pictures takes from the Hudson river:

left: collapse of WTC7, right: comparison with eruption of Mount St. Helen

left: comparison with eruption of St. Augustino, right flow at the Hudson river compared to Montserrat

As you can see from the pictures the pyroclastic flows at the WTC complex are very similar to those of volcanic eruptions. So again, what brought these buildings down? And most of all, why does the government not answer these questions?

Summary

1. Both towers were nearly identical and should have collapsed in roughly the same time producing roughly the same seismic energy. Yet there is a difference of 0.2 on the Richter scale, which is roughly 1.3 tons TNT. Where did the extra energy come from?

2. The top of the south tower did not fall as it should have according to Newton's laws, but instead took down the whole building ejecting tons of steel. Normally this type of collapse is only observed when controlled demolition is used.

3. Series of large explosions were heard and recorded at the basements of all three buildings producing large plumes of dust.

4. All three buildings fell almost at freefall on their own footprints which according to the laws of physics is impossible because of the resistence caused by air and debris. The freefall collapse of a high rise (steel framed) building can only be accomplished by means of controlled demolition.

5. All three buildings produced pyroclastic clouds upon collapse, indicating large explosions suspending fine dust into the air. This phenomenon is known to occur only in three situations: 1. volcanic eruptions, 2. turbidity currents, 3. collapses of buildings caused by controlled demolition

Conclusion

From all the evidence provided by film cameras, audio recorders, witnesses and pictures, the only conclusion we have left is that the three buildings WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 were brought down with controlled demolition. And I believe that if this attack with the same means were conducted by real terrorists from other countries, this would have been the official government explanation! As long as the government doesn't answer the serious questions people have, or come up with a real good and fitting explanation, they remain suspected of having commited these acts themselves, as to the present day there is nothing that would indicate or proof otherwise!