GOVERNMENT / THE ELITE - LOOKING GLASS NEWS | |
200 Insiders Against the World: Inside the Global Dominance Group |
|
by Peter Phillips Counter Punch Entered into the database on Thursday, February 09th, 2006 @ 14:25:02 MST |
|
The leadership class in the US is now dominated by a neo-conservative
group of some 200 people who have the shared goal of asserting US military power
worldwide. This Global Dominance Group, in cooperation with major military contractors,
has become a powerful force in military unilateralism and US political processes. A long thread of sociological research documents the existence of a dominant
ruling class in the US, which sets policy and determines national political
priorities. C. Wright Mills, in his 1956 book on the power elite, documented
how World War II solidified a trinity of power in the US that comprised corporate,
military and government elites in a centralized power structure working in unison
through "higher circles" of contact and agreement. Neo-conservatives promoting the US Military control of the world are now in
dominant policy positions within these higher circles of the US. Adbusters
magazine summed up neo-conservatism as: "The belief that Democracy,
however flawed, was best defended by an ignorant public pumped on nationalism
and religion. Only a militantly nationalist state could deter human aggression
Such nationalism requires an external threat and if one cannot be found it must
be manufactured." In 1992, during Bush the First's administration, Dick Cheney supported Lewis
Libby and Paul Wolfowitz in producing the "Defense Planning Guidance"
report, which advocated US military dominance around the globe in a "new
order." The report called for the United States to grow in military superiority
and to prevent new rivals from rising up to challenge us on the world stage. At the end of Clinton's administration, global dominance advocates founded
the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). Among the PNAC founders were
eight people affiliated with the number-one defense contractor Lockheed-Martin,
and seven others associated with the number-three defense contractor Northrop
Grumman. Of the twenty-five founders of PNAC twelve were later appointed to
high level positions in the George W. Bush administration. In September 2000, PNAC produced a 76-page report entitled Rebuilding America's
Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century. The report,
similar to the 1992 Defense Policy Guidance report, called for the
protection of the American Homeland, the ability to wage simultaneous theater
wars, perform global constabulary roles, and the control of space and cyberspace.
It claimed that the 1990s were a decade of defense neglect and that the US must
increase military spending to preserve American geopolitical leadership as the
world's superpower. The report also recognized that: "the process of transformation
is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event such
as a new Pearl Harbor." The events of September 11, 2001 presented exactly
the catastrophe that the authors of Rebuilding America' Defenses theorized
were needed to accelerate a global dominance agenda. The resulting permanent
war on terror has led to massive government defense spending, the invasions
of two countries, and the threatening of three others, and the rapid acceleration
of the neo-conservative plans for military control of the world. The US now spends as much for defense as the rest of the world combined. The
Pentagon's budget for buying new weapons rose from $61 billion in 2001 to over
$80 billion in 2004. Lockheed Martin's sales rose by over 30% at the same time,
with tens of billions of dollars on the books for future purchases. From 2000
to 2004, Lockheed Martins stock value rose 300%. Northrup-Grumann saw similar
growth with DoD contracts rising from $3.2 billion in 2001 to $11.1 billion
in 2004. Halliburton, with Dick Cheney as former CEO, had defense contracts
totaling $427 million in 2001. By 2003, they had $4.3 billion in defense contracts,
of which approximately a third were sole source agreements. At the beginning of 2006 the Global Dominance Group's agenda is well established
within higher circle policy councils and cunningly operationalized inside the
US Government. They work hand in hand with defense contractors promoting deployment
of US forces in over 700 bases worldwide. There is an important difference between self-defense from external threats,
and the belief in the total military control of the world. When asked, most
working people in the US have serious doubts about the moral and practical acceptability
of financing world domination A more in-depth review of the global dominance group's agenda and
a list of the 200 advocates see: http://www.projectcensored.org/
(pdf file) Peter Phillips is a Professor of Sociology at Sonoma State
University and Director of Project Censored a media research organization.
www.projectcensored.org |